Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG

Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG

A citizens’ anti-gambling initiative has been shot down by the State’s Attorney General

While the continuing state of Massachusetts is gearing up for rapid expansion of gambling in the state, not everybody has been excited about the move. That is why some anti-gambling activists there have created a petition so that you can force a statewide vote on set up casino tasks will be able to go ahead.

Those who are against the brand new casinos had been able to gather sufficient signatures to send the ballot question forward to the attorney general’s office. But unfortunately for them, the state solicitor however a stop to your move, saying that the ballot concern wouldn’t be legal under the state’s ballot initiative process.

Constitutional Provisions Preclude Ballot Question

The ballot initiative process is covered by Article 48 under the current state Constitution. That article not only describes the process for getting a relevant concern regarding the ballot, but also establishes so what can and cannot be included in such questions. One of the guidelines for proposals states that they cannot hinder an entity’s ‘right to get payment for personal property appropriated to public use’.

According to state solicitor Peter Sacks, if the relevant concern were to be approved by the public, thus closing the casino deals immediately, it could just take the casino developers’ contract rights away without the compensation. It would also ‘impair the implied agreements’ between the Massachusetts Gaming Commission and people designers, who have previously paid millions in application fees to the state. “Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG” の続きを読む