New York Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney
A November ny State casino referendum for voters has one attorney questioning the ballot’s wording
In November, New York voters are scheduled to vote for a referendum that would enable several casino that is new to be built throughout the state. But if one Brooklyn attorney is successful, that referendum shall be halted due to language into the ballot question he claims violates state law.
Referendum Language Questioned
The language in the referendum includes a quantity of ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposition in a light that is unmistakably positive. For instance, the concern mentions ‘promoting work growth, increasing aid to schools and allowing neighborhood governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was authorized by the State Board of Elections in July.
But now, attorney Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York law. In accordance with a lawsuit filed within the nyc State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the State Constitution’s prohibition on the utilization of public profit the aid of ‘private undertakings.’
‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you cannot use money that is public sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.
Snyder isn’t the only one who has had up problems with the language in the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also see it as one-sided, and groups that are religious also noted the language used when telling parishioners to consider social ills that could attend the advertised advantages of casino expansion. “New York Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney” の続きを読む